🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Rather, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the top three players in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive power on each front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much energy to win it. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only express his emotions or the strategy he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {